Withdrawal

Starting homeschool with no summer to plan it: what changes when a school placement fails, a family moves, or a crisis sets the timeline

Every guide in this dispatch so far has assumed a family with a clean runway, a decision reached over the spring, a summer to research curriculum and set up a room, and a first day in late August that the last two issues could treat as the actual beginning. Most families who homeschool arrive that way. Some do not. A school placement fails in October, a family relocates with two weeks of notice, or a crisis pulls a child out of a classroom on a Tuesday with no plan behind it, and that household is not late to the routine the last two issues described, it is solving a different problem. The state paperwork has to be filed correctly on the first attempt because there is no summer left to redo it. The curriculum has to be assembled from what a family can get its hands on this week, not what arrives by mail in six. And the child who just left school under duress usually needs more time to settle than any family in this position has time to give. This issue takes that family on its own terms instead of squeezing the September plan around it. Plus the policy dispatch, as the federal tax credit North Carolina joined moves a step closer to naming its approved organizations, more states have joined the program than the count in January reflected, and North Carolina's extended ESA+ families reach their acceptance deadline the same week this issue publishes.

The first sixteen issues of this dispatch have assumed, without saying so, a family that got to choose when its homeschool year began. That assumption produced clean arguments about routines and multi-age mornings, and it also quietly excluded a large and specific group: families who did not choose their start date at all. A school placement collapses in October. A move lands a family somewhere new with two weeks of notice and a child who has to be somewhere on a Monday. A crisis, a medical leave, a custody change, an expulsion, removes a child from a classroom with no plan behind it. None of these households get a summer to compare curriculum, build a school room, or ease into the decision, and the standard advice this dispatch has already given, buy less than expected, take a month per year of school to decompress, start the record on day one, was written with time this family does not have. This issue takes the compressed-timeline start on its own terms. It begins with the piece that is not optional and not academic: North Carolina requires a Notice of Intent filed with the Division of Non-Public Education before a child is withdrawn from an enrolled school and before home instruction begins, and DNPE's own guidance is explicit that a family should not withdraw a child or start teaching until it has received written acknowledgment that the notice was received, a sequencing gap that can run several business days and that a family already living inside a crisis frequently discovers only after acting out of order. It then addresses what actually changes about the teaching itself: no research runway means the safest first move is fewer subjects run from whatever is already at hand instead of a curriculum ordered and waited for, and a child arriving mid-crisis usually needs the decompression period this site has recommended elsewhere even though the family has the least slack to give it, a genuine tension this issue names instead of resolving with false reassurance. It closes with a plain list of what a first week in this situation needs and what can wait a month without cost. Plus the policy dispatch, covering the status of North Carolina's list of approved scholarship-granting organizations under the federal tax credit, an opt-in count that has grown since the 23-state figure this dispatch cited in January, and the August 17, 2026 deadline for North Carolina's extended ESA+ families, which lands on the date this issue publishes with no outcome yet on the record.